Modern analysis emphasizes that
human beings are not "commodities
" or "resources", but are
creative and social beings in a productive enterprise. The 2000 revision of ISO
9001in contrast requires identifying
the processes, their sequence and interaction, and to define and communicate responsibilities and
authorities. In general, heavily unionised nations such as Franceand
Germanyhave adopted and encouraged such
approaches. The International Labour Organization also in 2001 decided to revisit, and revise its 1975
Recommendation 150 on Human Resources Development.[8]
An important controversy
regarding labor mobility illustrates the broader philosophical issue with usage of the phrase "human
resources": governments of developing nations often regard developed nations that encourage immigration or
"guest workers" as appropriating human capital that is more rightfully part of the developing nation and
required to further its economic growth.
Over time,
the United
Nationshave come to more generally
support the developing nations' point of view, and have requested significant offsetting "foreign aid"
contributions so that a developing nation losing human capital does not lose the capacity to continue to
train new people in trades, professions, and the arts.[9]
|